Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Middendorf vs Mei Hasegawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Middendorf vs Hasegawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Middendorf vs Mei Hasegawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Middendorf 0 - 0 Hasegawa
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Middendorf has won 45.47% of points on their second serve, while Hasegawa has won 37.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Middendorf, in recent form, has won 52.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hasegawa has won 54.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.33% and 38.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Middendorf has saved 55.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hasegawa has saved 65.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Middendorf has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Hasegawa winning 48.65% (W/L 18/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Hasegawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 34/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 36/ 27), where as Hasegawa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 8/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Middendorf has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.27 while Hasegawa has played against players with an average rank of 97.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Middendorf has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hasegawa has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Middendorf has converted 47.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hasegawa has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
379
Rank
347
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
58% (106-76)
Career Total W/L
43% (38-51)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$5,362
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julia Middendorf vs Mei Hasegawa For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Middendorf VS Hasegawa
Sportsbook
Offer
Middendorf VS Hasegawa H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Middendorf | Mei Hasegawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (29/30) | 48% (14/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (256/269) | 51% (143/138) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 216.93 | 142.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (942/1505) | 63% (243/383) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (582/942) | 60% (146/243) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (256/563) | 37% (52/140) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (75/159) | 43% (21/49) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (646/1508) | 45% (176/387) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (12/13) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Julia Middendorf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Julia Middendorf
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Julia Victoria Rennert
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Svetac
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Alana Subasic
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Julia Middendorf
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Mariani
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Julia Middendorf
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Dea Herdzelas
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Micol Salvadori
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mei Hasegawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuka Hosoki
Player
Mei Hasegawa
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 5-7 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Mei Hasegawa
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mei Hasegawa
Player
Mana Ayukawa
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Middendorf Vs Hasegawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Middendorf are available here and Hasegawa photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
